Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL SKYBAY
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors, 3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '19 at 07:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 146
56% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 403
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1A58 674E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Lighting 5.17
Reflection 96.7
Parallax 4.81
4% 35.6 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 8.61
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLV512 512GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 191 165 161 158 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 677
Write 540
Mixed 336
SusWrite 196
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 29.9
97% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 605
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 530
402% 542 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 173%
Samsung Portable SSD T3 250GB
89GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.1% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 40.2
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 40.1
9% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 8.8
29% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 15
14% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback