Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '19 at 06:35
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3960X-$265
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 173
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 565
58% 471 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 140
Parallax 119
103% 128 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 124
Splatting 99.9
90% 111 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 273 273 274 274 275 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 463
Write 444
Mixed 354
SusWrite 292
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 36.1
118% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 226
206% 316 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 118%
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
97GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 161 164 165 167 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.6% Average
Read 246
Write 240
Mixed 226
SusWrite 162
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 19
68% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 144
124% 183 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
199GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 168 141 166 140 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 157
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 149
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
174GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 103 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 101
61% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB
3 of 8 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.2% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL(INTEL Xeon E5/Core i7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback