Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 09:24
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6600K APU-$88
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 102
53% 82 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 99.7
14% 102 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.2
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 24.5
17% 23.4 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 30.7
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD2500AACS-00ZWB0 250GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 88 86 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 91.5
Write 97.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 87.7
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 9.9
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback