Asrock Z87 Extreme4/TB4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4/TB4  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 26 '19 at 09:29
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$177
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 108
2-Core 218
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 409
58% 418 Pts
64-Core 419
28% 419 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 3.5
3% 4.16 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 4.17
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.01 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
240GB 240GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P051
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 187 84 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 450
Mixed 415
SusWrite 161
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 64.7
220% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 249
207% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$47
128GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 71 70 70 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 41.7
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 69.9
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 66%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78
201GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 58
Write 10.8
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 11.9
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 35%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
178GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 87.8
Mixed 48
SusWrite 87.6
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%
Seagate ST3808110AS 80GB-$33
54GB free
Firmware: 3.AD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 63 64 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 64
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 63.7
44% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 41%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power4G 4GB
3GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.8 2.9 3 2.9 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Read 8.5
Write 3.8
Mixed 5
SusWrite 2.8
6% 5.02 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905403-439.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z87 Extreme4/TB4 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4/TB4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback