Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive311% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Professional Gaming i9  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181022
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 22:23
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 273
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 828
84% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,131
70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Zotac(19DA 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 170
Parallax 167
144% 171 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 153
Splatting 111
118% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$120
215GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 380 469 471 472 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 473
Mixed 431
SusWrite 450
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 56.7
195% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 287
235% 336 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 381 472 470 471 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 477
Mixed 430
SusWrite 450
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 56.2
194% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 294
239% 339 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1910 1411 1412 1412 1414 1410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
311% Outstanding
Read 1,923
Write 2,336
Mixed 1,820
SusWrite 1,495
427% 1,893 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 81
302% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,244
DQ Write 1,019
DQ Mixed 1,139
851% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 311%
Great: 335%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: TD05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 141 146 143 153 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 130
Write 133
Mixed 71.4
SusWrite 147
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
236% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
193GB free
Firmware: A580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 70
Write 65.6
Mixed 36.9
SusWrite 70.7
44% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 29.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 8.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 Professional Gaming i9 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,225
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback