Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 LE (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '19 at 10:47
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	JOR-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 98.8 2-Core 197 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 384 50% 378 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7730 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 6% XFX(1682 32B0) 1GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.29% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 10.9 7% 10.2 fps	MRender 10.1 Gravity 7.67 Splatting 12.1 8% 9.95 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssdsc2kb 480G8L 01P 480GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: XCV1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 252 Write 77 Mixed 161 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 40.9 4K Mixed 26.7 86% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 61.3 DQ Write 96 DQ Mixed 66.7 54% 74.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 215GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 63.5 Mixed 21.8 32% 42.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
WD WD1600AVJS-63SWA0 160GB 1,301 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 27GB free Firmware: 58.01D58 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 63 Write 9.7 Mixed 42.5 29% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 52%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB 839 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 19GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 128 Write 13.7 Mixed 29.8 51% 57 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.4 156% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 Kingston 9905403-401.A00LF M378B1G73BH0-CK0 Kingston 9905403-401.A00LF 14GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.5% Good	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 20.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 19.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	309x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	230x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	86x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	82x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	72x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 60%, 17,012 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $639

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16