Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive369% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '19 at 19:33
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,070
100% 834 Pts
64-Core 1628
101% 1628 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 44.8
39% 49.2 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 62.3
49% 59.4 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
162GB free
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 921 924 925 925 924 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,376
Write 932
Mixed 656
SusWrite 924
217% 972 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 52.1
198% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,045
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 382
361% 584 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 203%
Great: 243%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2197 2211 2210 2210 2173 2183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
369% Outstanding
Read 2,562
Write 2213
Mixed 1,424
SusWrite 2,197
471% 2,099 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 76.1
260% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,246
DQ Write 1,072
DQ Mixed 1,145
862% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 369%
Great: 393%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB
246GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 488 487 491 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 464
Mixed 400
SusWrite 488
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 59.6
197% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
200GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 129 129 128 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 184
Write 153
Mixed 86
SusWrite 128
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 109%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
156GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 88.3
Write 82.7
Mixed 59
SusWrite 81
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2Z3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 30.2
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 31.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $440

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback