Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130918
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '19 at 14:09
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G620-$30 12,899 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 73.9 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 135 55% 92.2 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 131 18% 134 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E282) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.4.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Lighting 71.2 Reflection 59.8 Parallax 76.7 58% 69.3 fps	MRender 60.1 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 76.4 56% 66.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB 13,767 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM05H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 161 149 127 121 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 322 Write 190 Mixed 183 SusWrite 139 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 17.1 66% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 196 DQ Write 58 DQ Mixed 80.8 72% 111 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 73%
Samsung HD251KJ 250GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 103GB free Firmware: CM100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 57 56 56 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 57.7 Write 60.7 Mixed 39 SusWrite 56.4 39% 53.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 2,192 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.9 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.43 GB/s	Latency 92.7 43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	30x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	29x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	20x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	10x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
PSD34G133381 2x4GBPatriotBench 44%, 873 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $235

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16