Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 08:55
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 221
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 637
66% 530 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 61.2
51% 64.9 fps
MRender 74.9
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 60
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 136 141 149 159 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 163
Write 166
Mixed 118
SusWrite 143
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 108%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00SRLA0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 1.5 1.8 1.1 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 134
Write 149
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 8.7
118% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 75%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B 1TB
461GB free, PID 0711
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 81 82 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 81.6
Write 80.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 80.5
103% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 45%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 19 18 18 19 19 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 156
Write 161
Mixed 84
SusWrite 25.4
134% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 68%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 143 135 140 148 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 80
SusWrite 138
171% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 1 1.5 0.8 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 132
Write 135
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 4.9
108% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
140% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback