PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | EVGA Default string |
Motherboard | EVGA 111-SS-E172 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150810 |
Uptime | 3.5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 17 '19 at 19:19 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
EVGA(3842 2982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.3%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 53 37 38 38 39 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
|||
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
581GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 306 370 358 357 349 MB/s
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 19 19 19 17 19 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
63.9%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 29x |
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 21x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples | 7x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 107% - Outstanding | Total price: $336 |