Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 145 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 336 36% 288 Pts	64-Core 437 27% 437 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 16.3 Reflection 29.4 Parallax 21.5 13% 22.4 fps	MRender 22.4 Gravity 18.2 Splatting 19.1 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 98 18 34 14 18 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.9% Average	Read 232 Write 120 Mixed 175 SusWrite 57.7 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 22.5 81% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 173 DQ Mixed 109 102% 158 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: MN6OA5Q0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 150 152 152 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Read 150 Write 142 Mixed 85 SusWrite 151 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 12GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 11.2 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 11.6 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16