| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130416 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 22 '19 at 04:17 |
| Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.4%
Good
|
61% 96.5 Pts
|
36% 287 Pts
|
20% 322 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
20% 22.4 fps
|
19% 24.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 90 77 95 81 MB/s
|
49.8%
Average
|
61% 82.8 MB/s
|
192% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
47%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
63% 63.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 98 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 13x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 11x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 6x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $217 |