Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 22 '19 at 18:59
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,148
104% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 37B5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 128
Parallax 130
118% 134 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 134
Splatting 104
111% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 630 630 589 594 567 590 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,855
Write 1939
Mixed 718
SusWrite 600
285% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 59.6
213% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1381
DQ Write 1,287
DQ Mixed 1,301
986% 1323 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 236%
Great: 262%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
103GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 292 312 310 314 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 481
Mixed 463
SusWrite 294
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 57.3
191% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 233
206% 309 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 113%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
281GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 487 488 489 399 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 462
SusWrite 439
107% 475 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 56.8
190% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 264
223% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
907GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 88 89 116 126 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 78
Write 78.3
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 97.8
50% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
415GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 155 156 155 158 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 148
Write 150
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 155
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 32.5
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 29.9
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 55
73% 55 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,467 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $874
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback