Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics75.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory53.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '19 at 13:27
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 64
43% 60.4 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 235
20% 175 Pts
64-Core 676
42% 676 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.64
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.4% Very good
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 218
36% 113 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 209
Splatting 135
153% 194 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 193 219 196 207 201 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 362
Write 257
Mixed 226
SusWrite 202
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 18.4
66% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 78.9
DQ Mixed 106
85% 122 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
307GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 291 325 311 338 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 288
Write 170
Mixed 306
SusWrite 319
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 140
122% 180 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 185 185 189 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 193
Mixed 68
SusWrite 186
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
697GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 129 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 155
Write 148
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 127
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.3% Very good
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 31.1
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 11.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $763
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback