PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z (all builds) |
Memory | 25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150323 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 28 '19 at 17:29 |
Run Duration | 196 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX100 500GB-$40
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 80 96 109 189 138 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
|||
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
475GB free
Firmware: UH4400RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 80 3.9 69 58 116 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 97 88 77 71 70 MB/s
|
66.7%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 144 148 148 148 MB/s
|
81.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
657GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 200 200 198 200 198 MB/s
|
115%
Outstanding
|
|||
SDXC Card 128GB
119GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 15 15 15 15 MB/s
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2133 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 441x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 215x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 67x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 48x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 45x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $630 |