Acer Aspire SW5-012

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire SW5-012  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Fendi2
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '16 at 19:44
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 61.5
1-Core 16.3
2-Core 30.1
28% 36 Pts
4-Core 58.2
8-Core 58.1
8% 58.2 Pts
64-Core 56.9
4% 56.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0928) 1,009MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.7% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.78
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.14 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.7%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung CWBC3R 63GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 160
Write 46.7
Mixed 72.4
20% 93 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 4.92
36% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 4.78
8% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 20%
Generic SS32G SD Card 32GB
26GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 22.7
Write 21.3
Mixed 21.7
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.04
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 1.58
419% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.3
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback