Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '19 at 15:34
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 269
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 753
78% 627 Pts
64-Core 784
48% 784 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 186
Parallax 180
141% 179 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 174
Splatting 121
112% 138 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 825 584 580 585 579 581 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,869
Write 1,623
Mixed 644
SusWrite 622
264% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 59.1
216% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1172
DQ Write 1,288
DQ Mixed 849
744% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 234%
Great: 254%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
564GB free
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 1103 1088 1101 1105 1101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 1296
Write 1115
Mixed 773
SusWrite 1,099
240% 1,071 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 70.5
238% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1585
DQ Write 1,309
DQ Mixed 1,234
982% 1,376 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 257%
Great: 363%
FUJITSU MHT2060AT 60GB
56GB free, PID 002f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 24
Mixed 17.3
22% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
BUFFALO External HDD 4TB
390GB free, PID 027e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 13 8.7 18 12 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 17% Great: 59%
BUFFALO HD-GDU3 8TB
7TB free, PID 0235
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 182 183 185 181 178 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
277% Outstanding
Read 326
Write 388
Mixed 353
SusWrite 199
432% 316 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 30.3
3,135% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 68.7
DQ Mixed 19.1
3,075% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 277%
This bench: 277%
Great: 294%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.5% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback