Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6006U 47,111 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 66.8 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 57 36% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 86.6 8-Core 87.6 12% 87.1 Pts	64-Core 78.8 5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 520 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 39C5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	2.53% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 3.28 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 5.33 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 0.09 2% 2.82 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.53% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G3BTND-N210A 256GB 1,589 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 214 206 163 184 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 360 Write 242 Mixed 202 SusWrite 194 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 13.3 58% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 165 130% 180 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Ramaxel RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 6GB 907 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 15.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 10.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 520IntelBench 4%, 9,911 samples	793x
920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples	119x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	23x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	353x
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	59x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	45x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16