Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 16:02
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 198
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 584
66% 518 Pts
64-Core 577
36% 577 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2546
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 46.6
Parallax 29.4
23% 34.8 fps
MRender 9.76
Gravity 34.8
Splatting 49.8
28% 31.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 431 447 459 460 252 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 439
Write 404
Mixed 365
SusWrite 408
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 69.9
4K Mixed 33.7
114% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 291
208% 264 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89%
Great: 91%
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
22GB free
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 194 198 198 187 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 473
Write 196
Mixed 240
SusWrite 192
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 48.7
4K Mixed 28.4
102% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 48.8
48% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 90%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
462GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 30.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 39.6
43% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback