| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | RM DESKTOP 310 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Intel DQ67OW |
| Memory | 12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111111 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 16 '19 at 19:05 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | PRT-User |
| Background CPU | 65% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
54.6%
Above average
|
60% 99 Pts
|
28% 221 Pts
|
15% 236 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.18
|
36.2%
Below average
|
39% 43.9 fps
|
32% 38.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 284 290 293 292 289 MB/s
|
36.5%
Below average
|
44% 197 MB/s
|
33% 12.6 MB/s
|
22% 33.1 MB/s
|
|
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3 2.6 2.7 3.2 2.4 MB/s
|
3.48%
Terrible
|
5% 4.83 MB/s
|
15% 1.37 MB/s
| |
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical DESKTOP 310 Builds (Compare 146 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: RM DESKTOP 310
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 50x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 43x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $253 |