| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121016 |
| Uptime | 3.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 31 '19 at 18:11 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | FIN-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.6%
Good
|
62% 100 Pts
|
42% 346 Pts
|
27% 433 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
|
63.4%
Good
|
65% 78.6 fps
|
61% 73.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 90GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 51 56 52 50 MB/s
|
27.8%
Poor
|
16% 70.7 MB/s
|
62% 22.6 MB/s
|
17% 27.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
930GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 115 114 115 115 MB/s
|
83.1%
Excellent
|
82% 113 MB/s
|
176% 1.97 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 13 12 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
29% 22.4 MB/s
|
160% 2.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
46.6%
Average
|
47% 16.6 GB/s
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
58% 69.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
| FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |