Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJul 31 '19 at 18:11
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 76
2-Core 148
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 480
50% 390 Pts
64-Core 497
33% 497 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 76.6
64% 78.6 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 75.8
59% 73.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 90GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33A2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 51 56 52 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 93.7
Write 57.4
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 54.9
16% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 16.9
62% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 14.8
17% 27.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
930GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 115 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 174
Write 122
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 115
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 13 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 29
Write 19.8
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 17.5
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.7
160% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 1,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $809
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback