MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '19 at 00:52
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 292
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 575
8-Core 857
89% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 37D1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 116
Parallax 109
98% 115 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 86.7
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 235 167 274 277 280 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,792
Write 977
Mixed 414
SusWrite 279
190% 866 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 94.4
264% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 247
307% 549 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 205%
Great: 157%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
51GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 115 4.3 114 113 3.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 519
Write 465
Mixed 438
SusWrite 124
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 33.2
151% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 49.6
81% 157 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
90GB free
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 216 212 199 197 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 426
Mixed 287
SusWrite 212
103% 469 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 56.2
195% 69.6 MB/s
DQ Read 664
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 360
332% 514 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 138%
Great: 144%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 138 112 128 158 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 163
Write 148
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 143
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88%
Great: 109%
IS916 innostor 16GB
15GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 12.7
Write 24.2
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 24.6
26% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
68% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.2% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 30.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 29.8
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $702
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback