Prestigio PSB133S01ZFH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemPrestigio PSB133S01ZFH  (all builds)
MotherboardWeibu To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory0.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '19 at 12:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron N3350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
27% Poor
Memory 38.6
1-Core 47
2-Core 88.2
34% 57.9 Pts
4-Core 91.2
8-Core 89.8
12% 90.5 Pts
64-Core 91.3
6% 91.3 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.78% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.5
2% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 7.3
2% 6.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.78%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS420S 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 218 298 129 67 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 318
Write 17.4
Mixed 267
SusWrite 167
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 9.1
46% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 38.3
50% 91.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 6
15% 5.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PSB133S01ZFH Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Prestigio PSB133S01ZFH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $290Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $43
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback