PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Acer Aspire M3920 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Acer Aspire M3920 |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110218 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 06 '19 at 14:01 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2300
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 8420) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
|
30%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 127 53 54 52 51 MB/s
|
45.3%
Average
|
|||
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 MB/s
|
1.82%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2300IntelBench 64%, 19,722 samples | 30x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 29x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |