Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU+Radeon R6 Graphics 11 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Memory 42.6 1-Core 27.1 2-Core 53 26% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 66.9 8-Core 86.4 10% 76.7 Pts	64-Core 83.9 5% 83.9 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics 11 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 0123) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 2.34 1% 2.22 fps	MRender 1.57 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 2 1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GB-$100 901 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 92 99 109 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 290 Write 152 Mixed 176 SusWrite 104 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 38.7 4K Mixed 26.2 85% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 124 91% 118 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-401.A00LF 1x8GB 315 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 5 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 190 21% 190 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10 Micro-6700T APU+Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 22%, 11 samples	1x
A4 Micro-6400T APU + Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 26%, 101 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 101 samples	1x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 11 samples	1x

SSD
CMI59CS2404-120 120GBBench 38%, 1 sample	1x
SUV500MS120G 120GBKingstonBench 59%, 533 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 1x8GBMicronBench 25%, 2,370 samples	1x
Mac SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GBCorsairBench 25%, 52 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16