Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2467M 4,235 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 85.3 1-Core 43.5 2-Core 101 50% 76.5 Pts	4-Core 132 8-Core 134 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 04C8) 1GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8912 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.83 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 1.81 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3 3% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 150 149 151 150 149 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 447 Write 430 Mixed 380 SusWrite 180 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 31 100% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 311 235% 314 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB 6,518 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	45.1% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.4 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	38x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	21x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	6x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-H9 2x8GBHynixBench 43%, 63 samples	5x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16