PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac (all builds) |
Memory | 18 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170731 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 11 '19 at 06:45 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7900X-$420
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
|
85%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0824B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 154 77 76 59 87 MB/s
|
82.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275
2TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 264 292 346 225 412 MB/s
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 98 112 121 80 136 MB/s
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-7900XIntel $420Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 44x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 37x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 42x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 15x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $995 |