Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '19 at 14:39
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 74% 136 Pts	4-Core 449 8-Core 887 79% 668 Pts	64-Core 1222 76% 1222 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.7.5 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Lighting 64.3 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 74.6 52% 67.9 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 53.1 48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR1TB-D8 1TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 224GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 327 13 8 1.6 2.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 481 Write 273 Mixed 388 SusWrite 104 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 22.1 104% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 1.1 54% 128 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 105%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 470GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 51.7 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 39.9 39% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 49%
Seagate Game Drive Xbox 8TB 760 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 6TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 168 167 166 168 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 137 Write 124 Mixed 106 SusWrite 165 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.8 359% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 93%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 787GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 74 74 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 65%
WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 52GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.2% Very poor	Read 37 Write 36 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 0.1 32% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 36%
WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 37GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 131 Write 120 Mixed 104 SusWrite 1 112% 89.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 56%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 33 33 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 36.2 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 33.2 45% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 43%
WDC WD20 EADS-00W4B0 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 688GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.4 4.1 4.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.5% Very poor	Read 37 Write 36.5 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 4.2 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 13%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,232 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 137 152 152 148 152 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 115 Write 76.5 Mixed 82 SusWrite 133 136% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 0.8 370% 3.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 10.7 DQ Mixed 0.9 396% 4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 76%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 736GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.94% Terrible	Read 36 Write 34.5 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 0.8 32% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.94% Great: 59%
ST350041 8AS 500GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 459GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 120 119 117 110 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 131 Write 129 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 116 149% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 51%
ST375052 5AS 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 676GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 120 119 116 110 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 91.5 Write 125 Mixed 74.2 SusWrite 115 142% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 49%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 115 Write 112 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 0.6 99% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.9 275% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB 1,843 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.1% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 24.8 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 29 SC Mixed 24.1 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 98.5 41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,431x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	229x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)