Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X99E-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '19 at 04:40
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.20GHz 680 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 68.1 1-Core 65.2 2-Core 131 52% 88 Pts	4-Core 237 8-Core 496 43% 366 Pts	64-Core 1198 74% 1198 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 35.6 30% 33.9 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 36.3 Splatting 34.2 29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 251GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 120 120 190 429 246 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 742 Write 539 Mixed 606 SusWrite 272 121% 540 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 31.4 106% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 436 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 364 267% 354 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 144%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB 20,415 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 17.9 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 85%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	41x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	39x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	16x
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	9x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	6x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 81%, 7,649 samples	6x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GBG.SKILL $70Bench 72%, 6,515 samples	12x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GBCorsairBench 69%, 3,147 samples	9x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $1,569

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16