Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '19 at 17:14
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 126 2-Core 252 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 648 73% 574 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 37D2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.8% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 109 Parallax 116 93% 113 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 95.4 Splatting 79.3 81% 103 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 120GB-$98 9,315 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 26 37 28 33 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.5% Poor	Read 246 Write 42 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 31.1 18% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 23.4 4K Mixed 10.7 53% 17.3 MB/s	DQ Read 78.7 DQ Write 11.8 DQ Mixed 3.6 13% 31.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 84%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 996GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 36 36 34 36 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 18 Write 35 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 42.3 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 43% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GLLG42F-18---------- 2x8GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 22.1 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 20.2 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,177x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	681x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	211x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	302x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	207x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $295Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	205x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	247x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	152x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	87x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	115x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16