Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 18 '19 at 04:33
Run Duration2449 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 95.1
1-Core 90
2-Core 176
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 341
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 232 227 224 225 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
63% Good
Read 322
Write 218
Mixed 212
SusWrite 226
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 27.2
96% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 94.5
87% 134 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 63%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
11GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 59 72 89 90 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 95.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 90.2
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
33GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 68 64 72 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 69.5
Write 74.2
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 89.6
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
685GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 101 96 96 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 109
Write 112
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 97.3
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
609GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 82 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 81.5
Write 44
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 83.2
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
12GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 93 89 93 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 26.7
Write 40.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 90.5
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
89GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 51 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35% Below average
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 50.6
118% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35%
Great: 53%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
163GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 51 51 50 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 96.2
Write 65.2
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 50.6
84% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
234GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 155
Write 158
Mixed 39
SusWrite 0.1
105% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
89% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
152GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 2.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 0.5
95% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 53%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 98 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 116
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 97.4
137% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.9% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback