Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime5 Days
Run DateAug 24 '19 at 07:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 59.6
2-Core 112
55% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 316
32% 260 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.5% Good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 113
Parallax 98.2
79% 102 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 95.6
Splatting 0.09
46% 64 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU480G1122 480GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 108 37 87 161 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 245
Write 343
Mixed 189
SusWrite 98.9
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 0.2
39% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 0.2
6% 14.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 67%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
425GB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 113 115 104 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 161
Write 138
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 110
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.7
218% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 114 116 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 101
Write 102
Mixed 74.7
SusWrite 118
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback