Asus G30AB

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus G30AB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G30AB
Memory	23.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130705
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '19 at 07:56
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 215 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 567 61% 483 Pts	64-Core 580 36% 580 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.9% Poor	Lighting 35.1 Reflection 27.9 Parallax 31.6 29% 31.5 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 34.4 30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk U110 128GB-$69 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: U220000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 94 38 51 29 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 365 Write 303 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 55.1 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 11 23% 7.83 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 12.7 DQ Mixed 15.5 13% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 236GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 108 108 108 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 167 Write 142 Mixed 31 SusWrite 107 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 M378B5173DB0-CK0 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 28GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.7% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 20.3 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G30AB Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Asus G30AB

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	209x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	25x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	23x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	18x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	37x
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	25x
RBU-SC400S37256G 256GBKingstonBench 77%, 443 samples	11x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	56x
SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 513 samples	25x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16