Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '19 at 12:29
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 800
67% 579 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
MSI(1462 3812) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.8.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 116
Parallax 243
111% 165 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 133
Splatting 156
112% 134 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 362 361 366 363 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 714
Write 647
Mixed 648
SusWrite 364
133% 593 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 75.1
249% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 918
625% 760 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 159%
Great: 340%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
387GB free
Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1525 870 873 907 874 867 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,988
Write 1,842
Mixed 846
SusWrite 986
316% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 50.4
182% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 878
DQ Mixed 603
488% 678 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 228%
Great: 372%
Transcend TS1TMTE220S 1TB
615GB free
Firmware: 42A0S63A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 237 233 232 231 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 720
Write 675
Mixed 110
SusWrite 233
96% 434 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 85.2
282% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 582
449% 619 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 159%
Great: 359%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 72 72 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 140
Write 134
Mixed 93
SusWrite 72.2
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
26GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 7.4 12 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 86.2
Write 51.1
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 10.4
47% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 2.3
112% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 42.3
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 37.3
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 29.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback