PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H77-V LE (all builds) |
Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140317 |
Uptime | 7.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 04 '19 at 03:19 |
Run Duration | 201 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
67%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 55 55 70 93 98 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
|||
60.3%
Good
|
||||
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$95
124GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 208 208 209 210 211 MB/s
|
48.9%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
231GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 99 101 99 103 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
43%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
47.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 397x |
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 125x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 100x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 75x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 73x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 55x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $494 |