Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '19 at 10:12
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 146
2-Core 283
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 478
66% 488 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2016 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 20
Splatting 27.3
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922H1S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 48 205 33 77 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 473
Mixed 416
SusWrite 123
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 48.8
172% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 237
193% 268 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 110%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
57GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 206 213 212 225 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 216
Mixed 282
SusWrite 208
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 51.5
180% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 251
180% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 94%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
63GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 196 251 241 229 235 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 466
Write 257
Mixed 229
SusWrite 228
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 25.8
103% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 77.4
DQ Mixed 137
113% 170 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
67GB free
Firmware: 1AG01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42% Average
Read 72
Write 51
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 74.3
45% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
123GB free
Firmware: GJ002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 41 42 43 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30% Below average
Read 62.8
Write 45.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 41.4
32% 43.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB-$169
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 26.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 26.1
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $772
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback