Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3060 20,242 User benchmarks, average bench 18% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 37.1 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 44.9 23% 35.5 Pts	4-Core 44.9 8-Core 41.7 6% 43.3 Pts	64-Core 34 2% 34 Pts
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 191D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.15 Parallax 2.41 1% 1.72 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 1.67 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 254 314 359 361 370 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 456 Write 380 Mixed 350 SusWrite 320 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 26 88% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 60.3 49% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 50,921 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	54x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	38x
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	17x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	127x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	36x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P2 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 1,759 samples	17x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6DFR8A-PB 8GBSamsungBench 32%, 115 samples	13x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16