Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190618
Uptime	11.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '19 at 12:58
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 204 73% 129 Pts	4-Core 408 8-Core 783 71% 596 Pts	64-Core 1,107 68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Asus(1043 86BB) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 91.6 Reflection 81.7 112% 86.7 fps
Poor: 62% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253TD120G 120GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 151 143 149 147 148 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 434 Mixed 423 SusWrite 163 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 57.2 186% 63.5 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 134 162% 283 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 219 219 219 219 219 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 149 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 216 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 466GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 133 133 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 132 Write 133 Mixed 66 SusWrite 132 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB 3,114 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,460x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,304x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	733x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	652x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	715x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	338x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	291x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16