Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 115 48% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 393 40% 322 Pts	64-Core 457 28% 457 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB 11,477 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 330 346 321 335 355 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 396 Write 319 Mixed 250 SusWrite 333 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 20.6 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 22.5 78% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 186 161% 237 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 101%
Intel SSDPEDMD800G4 800GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 243% 405GB free Firmware: 8DV10171 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1575 1606 1606 1618 1594 1632 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	167% Outstanding	Read 595 Write 1,652 Mixed 645 SusWrite 1,605 257% 1,124 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 32.4 107% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 297 216% 280 MB/s
Poor: 177% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 301%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1881ED58E9 RMR1881ED58E9 Samsung M391B5773DH0- Samsung M391B5773DH0- 12GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.8% Very good	MC Read 31.8 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 29 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E5-2620 v2IntelBench 60%, 2,742 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GU7MFR8C RMR1881ED58E9 RMR1881ED58E9 16GBHynixBench 42%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16