Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	31% Below average	Memory 48.5 1-Core 21.4 2-Core 42.7 26% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 80 8-Core 81.6 11% 80.8 Pts	64-Core 70.3 4% 70.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1C4D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 3.34 2% 1.85 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 2.57 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GB 7,448 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2301Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 24 24 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 377 Write 27.8 Mixed 53.1 SusWrite 23.3 26% 120 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 12.9 4K Mixed 11.5 37% 11.5 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 13.8 DQ Mixed 24.1 35% 70.8 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4KTF51264HZ-1G6A1 1x4GB 341 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 5.5 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 0.2 SC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.67 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 11%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
PM871b M.2 2280 128GBSamsungBench 83%, 2,851 samples	1x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	1x

RAM
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 2,027 samples	1x
4KTF51264HZ-1G6A1 1x4GBMicronBench 17%, 341 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16