Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B51
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180822
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '19 at 07:15
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$280 32,736 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 150 2-Core 316 102% 187 Pts	4-Core 636 8-Core 1,249 112% 942 Pts	64-Core 1,253 78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 230A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1189 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	22.3% Poor	Lighting 26.6 Reflection 30 Parallax 32.7 22% 29.8 fps	MRender 28.8 Gravity 24.6 Splatting 31.3 23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$113 27,087 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 419GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 385 406 401 409 410 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 444 Write 414 Mixed 282 SusWrite 401 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 38.2 128% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 273 221% 313 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 116%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 233GB free Firmware: EXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 407 408 408 408 409 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 2,100 Write 2261 Mixed 1,576 SusWrite 590 365% 1,632 MB/s	4K Read 66 4K Write 188 4K Mixed 92.4 318% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,002 DQ Write 1,646 DQ Mixed 1,157 924% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 280%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 19 22 19 19 22 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 94.4 Write 50 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 18.9 50% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 40% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 1x8GB-$25 15,315 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.8 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 57.3 70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,617x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,540x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,313x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	891x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	762x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	699x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,078x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	988x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	693x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $959

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16