Asus PRIME Z270-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-K  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 22:11
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 236
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 409
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85E0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 75
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 65.4
61% 72.1 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 70.3
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 449
Mixed 387
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 44.8
156% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 245
204% 292 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 92%
Transcend TS120GMTS420S 120GB
102GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 384 394 406 404 398 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 407
Mixed 322
SusWrite 390
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 20.3
135% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 82
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 27.3
71% 142 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
43GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 106 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 138
Write 122
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 102
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
146GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 161 158 156 151 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 174
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 153
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
846GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 148 149 151 151 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 138
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 148
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 85%
Mass Storage Device 320GB
247GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 40.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 40.8
48% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 35%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-K Builds (Compare 2,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-K - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $867
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback