Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X507UF
Memory	10 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '19 at 11:23
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	11%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 217 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 550 62% 489 Pts	64-Core 542 34% 542 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia MX130 14,117 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1A1E) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3648 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	8.2% Terrible	Lighting 11.3 Reflection 9.69 Parallax 9.53 9% 10.2 fps	MRender 12.9 Gravity 13.2 Splatting 0.04 6% 8.73 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.2% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 114 113 114 112 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 440 Write 282 Mixed 184 SusWrite 117 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 38 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 46.6 167% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 37.8 DQ Write 93.7 DQ Mixed 47.1 41% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 139 141 141 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 113 Write 125 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 137 71% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.4 130% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB 1,526 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.2% Good	MC Read 27 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 19.6 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 24.5 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 89.9 44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UF

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	376x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	39x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	21x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	308x
MX130NvidiaBench 9%, 14,117 samples	133x
HD Graphics 620IntelBench 4%, 8,599 samples	11x

SSD
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	23x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	22x
SA400M8240G 240GBKingstonBench 70%, 27,523 samples	15x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	197x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	36x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16