PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3P-B3 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111012 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 16 '19 at 15:47 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 72% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 36 46 46 47 48 MB/s
|
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3400832AS 400GB-$68
216GB free
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 40 49 50 45 53 MB/s
|
28.4%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s
|
7.6%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 87x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 59x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 19x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $531 |