Asus H81M-C/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C/BR (all builds)
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '19 at 16:40
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 107 2-Core 216 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 419 56% 421 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Lighting 46.7 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 39.7 38% 39.6 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 38 33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HYUNDAI/480G 480GB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 377GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0831B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 410 409 420 412 416 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	Read 475 Write 406 Mixed 360 SusWrite 390 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 19.6 120% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 24.4 74% 152 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 95%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 626GB free Firmware: 2AR20003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 81 82 81 82 83 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 79.3 Write 58.8 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 79.2 49% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-040.A00LF 2x8GB 1,305 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	53.4% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 17 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C/BR Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C/BR

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	55x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	35x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	26x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	29x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16