Casper EXCALIBUR G770

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCasper EXCALIBUR G770  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER G770 001
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 22 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 85.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 253
86% 155 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 725
75% 602 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Quanta(152D 1199) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.97
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 8.25
6% 15.5 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 7.47
Splatting 16.4
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1084 352 372 398 402 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,236
Write 1,925
Mixed 1,302
SusWrite 501
332% 1,491 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 63.7
228% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 971
676% 855 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 226%
Great: 302%
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
215GB free
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 97 98 99 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 443
Write 339
Mixed 331
SusWrite 135
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 33.1
128% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 193
174% 261 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-026.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 10.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EXCALIBUR G770 Builds (Compare 3,265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR G770

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $45
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback