Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '19 at 17:09
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	51%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 113 2-Core 221 75% 135 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 598 56% 465 Pts	64-Core 923 57% 923 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Lighting 68 Reflection 67.2 Parallax 65.9 55% 67 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 69.7 56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 76 75 73 78 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 338 Write 95.2 Mixed 104 SusWrite 76.6 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 15.4 66% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 95.4 DQ Mixed 53.6 84% 168 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 146 146 146 147 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 138 Write 107 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 145 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 147 147 147 146 142 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 67.3 SusWrite 144 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 948GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 96 96 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 89.9 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 96.1 65% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 582GB free Firmware: CC3C SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 112 106 108 108 109 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	Read 89.6 Write 95.1 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 107 63% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 396GB free Firmware: CC3C SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 109 107 114 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 100 Write 108 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 110 70% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 69%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 100 102 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 116 Write 104 Mixed 64.9 SusWrite 101 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 101%
WD My Book 1230 6TB 1,283 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 112GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 83 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 104 Write 97.3 Mixed 69.9 SusWrite 83 118% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 68%
WD My Book 1140 3TB 6,710 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 95 93 94 98 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 106 Write 97.1 Mixed 67.9 SusWrite 94.8 122% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 30,689 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.3% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 24.8 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 19 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,431x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	229x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)