Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 80% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds)
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180705
Uptime	17 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '19 at 17:48
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 252 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 738 77% 619 Pts	64-Core 712 44% 712 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3793) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	98.5% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 139 Parallax 131 103% 132 fps	MRender 98.8 Gravity 124 Splatting 107 90% 110 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.5% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 98 102 100 111 108 MB/s Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.2% Good	Read 247 Write 132 Mixed 198 SusWrite 102 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 37.9 149% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 111 88% 120 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 75%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 163GB free Firmware: SAFM02.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 495 489 487 496 499 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 460 Write 417 Mixed 335 SusWrite 492 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 40.8 152% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 183 181% 290 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 111%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 325GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 78 79 80 79 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 69 Write 69.1 Mixed 39 SusWrite 79.1 47% 64.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 113% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 23 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 25.4 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 59.3 68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	105x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	99x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	93x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	92x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $844

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16