Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite Pro L730 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110824
Uptime	20.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '19 at 13:18
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 84.7 1-Core 71.3 2-Core 142 60% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 181 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FCC0) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.17 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.17 2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 227 252 253 250 253 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 339 Write 329 Mixed 209 SusWrite 250 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 25.1 81% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.7 DQ Write 90.2 DQ Mixed 34.4 33% 50.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB 13,596 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16