Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 09 '19 at 19:12
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 86.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
97% 178 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,013
97% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,430
88% 1,430 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 44.6
39% 49 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62
48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 42%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 588 325 324 324 325 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
257% Outstanding
Read 2439
Write 1,458
Mixed 1,294
SusWrite 368
307% 1,390 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 85.7
294% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 977
DQ Write 1,100
DQ Mixed 1,010
768% 1,029 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 257%
Great: 280%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
393GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1095 734 102 102 141 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,383
Write 1,150
Mixed 939
SusWrite 379
215% 963 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 79
274% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 704
DQ Mixed 271
314% 537 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 193%
Great: 255%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
398GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 469 468 472 419 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 473
Mixed 430
SusWrite 454
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 57.3
195% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 310
250% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 126%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
665GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 470 468 449 427 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 460
Mixed 436
SusWrite 452
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 58.3
190% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 308
249% 350 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
877GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 158 159 159 158 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 127
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 157
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 34
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 35.5
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,013
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback